<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> </head> <body> <div class="BodyFragment"> <div class="PlainText"> Hi Hendrik, ok, the routine is attached now. by mistake, only info file was attached in my previous email.. We are validating this routine in CMS and also would like to check with Rivet experts. We observe a discrepancy for one of the MC and trying to debug the things. Therefore, we would like to be sure that the Rivet routine is fine. Thanks again, Sercan </div> </div> <div class="BodyFragment"> <div class="PlainText"> On Dec 14, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Hendrik Hoeth wrote: > Hi Sercan, > >> We would be happy if you can check the attached Rivet routine (CMS >> inelastic cross-section paper, <a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.6718v1.pdf"> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.6718v1.pdf</a>) >> and let us know if there is any mismatch with the routine and with the >> measurement described in the paper. > > From what I can see, the .info file looks good. Since you haven't > attached anything else, I assume you've sent the actual analysis code to > someone in CMS who knows the analysis and can validate it. Good > decision, we couldn't have done the validation anyways! > >> This is very similar to the ATLAS inelastic cross-section measurement >> which is already validated by you. Therefore, I believe it may take a >> few seconds for you to check this routine as well. > > As I said, the file you sent us looks good. > >> A view from experts would really help us to figure out the problems >> and validate this routine in CMS. > > What problems do you experience? Maybe if you are more specific or send > us an example, we can help? > > Cheers, > > Hendrik > > -- > If your dreams don't scare you, then you are not dreaming big enough. </div> </div> </body> </html>