<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Hello Hendrik, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Many thanks. I added some control plots to debug the routine and understood the problem yesterday. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Below line in the routine should be corrected as "5e-6" since the \xi cut given in the paper is "5x10e-6". That's the bug. Therefore, I was observing a few mb less cross-section than given in the paper. </div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: sans-serif; ">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; "> if (xi < 5*10e-6) vetoEvent;</pre>
</span></div>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>BTW, I've also done some cosmetic changes to your .plot and .info files.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for this which looks better now. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think CMS routine should be sent by CMS, but this correction on the \xi cut is necessary also for ATLAS routine (ATLAS_2011_I894867).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks again,</div>
<div>Sercan</div>
<br>
<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder">
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<br>
<div>
<div>On Dec 17, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Hendrik Hoeth wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Hi Sercan,<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">We would be happy if you can check the attached Rivet routine (CMS<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">inelastic cross-section paper, [...]<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">This is very similar to the ATLAS inelastic cross-section measurement<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">which is already validated by you.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I've changed the code such that it corresponds directly to the ATLAS<br>
analysis as it is in svn, so that it is easier to compare. Except for<br>
the n_charged histogram entries the analysis is identical to the ATLAS<br>
analysis and my code still produces identical results to yours.<br>
<br>
If your physics analysis is identical to ATLAS', then your Rivet code<br>
looks fine (though I'd rather put my version into svn ...). Since I<br>
don't know what kind of problems you observe, I'm afraid I can't help<br>
you further than this.<br>
<br>
BTW, I've also done some cosmetic changes to your .plot and .info files.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Hendrik<br>
<br>
-- <br>
If your dreams don't scare you, then you are not dreaming big enough.<br>
<span><CMS_2012_I1193338.cc></span><span><CMS_2012_I1193338.info></span><span><CMS_2012_I1193338.plot></span>_______________________________________________<br>
Rivet mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Rivet@projects.hepforge.org">Rivet@projects.hepforge.org</a><br>
http://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>