<html><head></head><body>OK, will do. Thanks very much for the quick replies and advice. Jim <div class="gmail_quote">On 12 February 2015 21:54:02 CET, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley@cern.ch> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <pre class="k9mail">Short answer: yes, and it'll be fixed in the next release. For now making a cut on the constituent neutrino will be almost entirely equivalent (assuming there's only one significant source of missing ET in your events). Apologies for the bug! Andy On 12/02/15 20:45, Deepak Kar wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi James, This thread may be of help: <a href="https://www.hepforge.org/lists-archive/rivet/2015-January/005373.html">https://www.hepforge.org/lists-archive/rivet/2015-January/005373.html</a> Cheers, Deepak On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:40 PM, James Henderson <James.Henderson@physics.ox.ac.uk> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hello, I was implementing WFinder in my analysis using the afs setup at: /afs/<a href="http://cern.ch/sw/lcg/external/MCGenerators_lcgcmt67b/rivet/2.2.0/x86_64-slc6-gcc48-opt">cern.ch/sw/lcg/external/MCGenerators_lcgcmt67b/rivet/2.2.0/x86_64-slc6-gcc48-opt</a>/ I see that the missing eT cut is not respected by wfinder in that the constituentNeutrino eT is often well below the missing eT cut requested in the wfinder constructor. Looking at /afs/<a href="http://cern.ch/sw/lcg/external/MCGenerators_lcgcmt67b/rivet/2.2.0/share/sources/src/Projections/WFinder.cc">cern.ch/sw/lcg/external/MCGenerators_lcgcmt67b/rivet/2.2.0/share/sources/src/Projections/WFinder.cc</a> (lines 125-131) I see the missingET cut is applied on the scalar sum of the visible momentum in the event rather than on the missing momentum. Should this cut not be applied to the transverse magnitude of the vector sum of the total event momentum rather than the scalar sum? Thanks, Jim <hr /> Rivet mailing list Rivet@projects.hepforge.org <a href="https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet">https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet</a> </blockquote> </blockquote> </pre></blockquote></div> -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>