<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 13/05/16 08:34, Chris Pollard wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:CANfdNFbjq+MnJTgQ9DXXzB+nuGsEFHTD-k9ZeriKmaXvkvRj-Q@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> <div dir="ltr">Hi Holger, <div> </div> <div>What do you mean they were used in previous tests exactly? If they did not exist in rivet how were they tested?</div> <div> </div> </div> </blockquote> Hi Chris, rivet-diff reads in the combinations file and skips analyses not present in either of the two rivet versions compared. That's fine of course. My suggestion would have been to clean up the combinations file instead such that the test really only yells if there is an issue. Holger <blockquote cite="mid:CANfdNFbjq+MnJTgQ9DXXzB+nuGsEFHTD-k9ZeriKmaXvkvRj-Q@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <div dir="ltr"> <div>Chris</div> <div class="gmail_extra"> <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Andy Buckley <<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:andy.buckley@cern.ch" target="_blank">andy.buckley@cern.ch</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Holger, At least some of those still exist as source code in the analyses directory -- maybe they are still marked as UNVALIDATED and hence not built by default? In that case it would be better to push to get them validated. I only explicitly checked for code for the top 3, of which the BELLE_2006 seems to not exist at all but the first two CDF ones do. I think the CDF_2008_LEADINGJETS was replaced by a final version matching the publication, in which the jet and Drell-Yan UE measurements were combined (i.e. that analysis needs to be tested with both process types). Andy On 11/05/16 12:02, Holger Schulz wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Hi, the following analyses are no longer existing in rivet but were used in the rivet tests previously: ATLAS_2012_I1082009 BELLE_2006_S6265367 CDF_1993_S2742446 CDF_1996_S3108457 CDF_1996_S3349578 CDF_1997_S3541940 CDF_2001_S4563131 CDF_2008_LEADINGJETS CDF_2008_NOTE_9351 CDF_2008_S7541902 D0_1996_S3214044 D0_1996_S3324664 D0_2000_S4480767 *DELPHI_2003_WUD_03_11* *E735_1998_S3905616* LHCB_2010_S8758301 LHCB_2011_I917009 LHCB_2011_I919315 MC_PHOTONJETUE OPAL_1993_S2692198 *SFM_1984_S1178091* STAR_2008_S7869363 I would like to remove all of the above from the automatic tests. I marked the ones I definitely know are obsolete in bold. Please let me know if you happen to know if any of them has been replaced by another analysis. Thanks, Holger _______________________________________________ Rivet mailing list <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Rivet@projects.hepforge.org" target="_blank">Rivet@projects.hepforge.org</a> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet</a> </blockquote> -- Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow _______________________________________________ Rivet mailing list <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Rivet@projects.hepforge.org" target="_blank">Rivet@projects.hepforge.org</a> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet</a> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </body> </html>