<div dir="ltr">Hi Holger,<div><br></div><div>What do you mean they were used in previous tests exactly? If they did not exist in rivet how were they tested?</div><div><br></div><div>Chris</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Andy Buckley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andy.buckley@cern.ch" target="_blank">andy.buckley@cern.ch</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Holger,<br>
<br>
At least some of those still exist as source code in the analyses directory -- maybe they are still marked as UNVALIDATED and hence not built by default? In that case it would be better to push to get them validated.<br>
<br>
I only explicitly checked for code for the top 3, of which the BELLE_2006 seems to not exist at all but the first two CDF ones do. I think the CDF_2008_LEADINGJETS was replaced by a final version matching the publication, in which the jet and Drell-Yan UE measurements were combined (i.e. that analysis needs to be tested with both process types).<br>
<br>
Andy<span><br>
<br>
<br>
On 11/05/16 12:02, Holger Schulz wrote:<br>
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>
Hi, the following analyses are no longer existing in rivet but were used<br>
in the rivet tests previously: ATLAS_2012_I1082009<br>
BELLE_2006_S6265367<br>
CDF_1993_S2742446<br>
CDF_1996_S3108457<br>
CDF_1996_S3349578<br>
CDF_1997_S3541940<br>
CDF_2001_S4563131<br>
CDF_2008_LEADINGJETS<br>
CDF_2008_NOTE_9351<br>
CDF_2008_S7541902<br>
D0_1996_S3214044<br>
D0_1996_S3324664<br>
D0_2000_S4480767<br></span>
*DELPHI_2003_WUD_03_11*<br>
*E735_1998_S3905616*<span><br>
LHCB_2010_S8758301<br>
LHCB_2011_I917009<br>
LHCB_2011_I919315<br>
MC_PHOTONJETUE<br>
OPAL_1993_S2692198<br></span>
*SFM_1984_S1178091*<span><br>
STAR_2008_S7869363<br>
<br>
I would like to remove all of the above from the automatic tests.<br>
<br>
I marked the ones I definitely know are obsolete in bold.<br>
<br>
Please let me know if you happen to know if any of them has been replaced<br>
by another analysis.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Holger<br>
<br>
<br>
<br></span>
_______________________________________________<br>
Rivet mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Rivet@projects.hepforge.org" target="_blank">Rivet@projects.hepforge.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet</a><br>
<br><span><font color="#888888">
</font></span></blockquote><span><font color="#888888">
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow<br>
Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Rivet mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Rivet@projects.hepforge.org" target="_blank">Rivet@projects.hepforge.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div>