<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hi riveteers and Graeme,</p>
<p>I have noticed that the data stored in hepdata and their
equivalent in rivet<br>
are diverging quite a bit. This mail is just a report I do not
have any suggestions<br>
but would like to remind everyone that this problem exists.<br>
</p>
<p>Not only are the histokeys quite different in the sample I
checked but also the<br>
binning and the numerical precision of central values at times can
differ quite<br>
a bit. Further, new analyses don't seem to make it into hepdata
even after half a<br>
year or so (e.g. ATLAS_2017_I1509919).</p>
<p>I was toying with the in principle very helpful yodastat download
link that gives<br>
you the yoda files with statistical errors only and is hence
desirable for<br>
more in depth statistical analysis. But due to the inconsistencies
it cannot be<br>
used without great pain.</p>
<p>If you want to have a look, I checked this entry:<br>
</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/irn8994773/yoda">http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/irn8994773/yoda</a><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
against
<blockquote>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://rivet.hepforge.org/hg/rivet/file/6375cc481dd0/data/refdata/ATLAS_2011_S8994773.yoda">https://rivet.hepforge.org/hg/rivet/file/6375cc481dd0/data/refdata/ATLAS_2011_S8994773.yoda</a><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Any thoughts and discussions are welcome.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br>
Holger<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>