|
[Rivet-svn] r1874 - trunk/src/Analysesblackhole at projects.hepforge.org blackhole at projects.hepforge.orgTue Oct 6 11:49:54 BST 2009
Author: buckley Date: Tue Oct 6 11:49:54 2009 New Revision: 1874 Log: Regressing d(eta) change, since I was looking at the wrong histo. The cross-section still looks pretty weird: too low for Nch, too high for sum(Et)... Modified: trunk/src/Analyses/UA1_1990_S2044935.cc Modified: trunk/src/Analyses/UA1_1990_S2044935.cc ============================================================================== --- trunk/src/Analyses/UA1_1990_S2044935.cc Tue Oct 6 11:41:29 2009 (r1873) +++ trunk/src/Analyses/UA1_1990_S2044935.cc Tue Oct 6 11:49:54 2009 (r1874) @@ -90,9 +90,9 @@ } // Particle/track level histos - const double deta = 5.0; //< @todo No factor of 2 for both sides? + const double deta = 2 * 5.0; const double dphi = TWOPI; - const double dnch_deta = nch/5.0; + const double dnch_deta = nch/5.0; //< @todo No factor of 2 for both sides? foreach (const Particle& p, cfs.particles()) { const double pt = p.momentum().pT(); const double scaled_weight = weight/(deta*dphi*pt); @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ void finalize() { const double xsec = crossSection(); if (_sumwTrig > 0) { + /// @todo Normalisation seems low by factor of ~2: normalize(_hist_Nch200, xsec/millibarn * _sumwTrig/sumOfWeights()); normalize(_hist_Nch500, xsec/millibarn * _sumwTrig/sumOfWeights()); normalize(_hist_Nch900, xsec/millibarn * _sumwTrig/sumOfWeights());
More information about the Rivet-svn mailing list |