|
[Rivet] rev. 890 broke CDF_2008_DRELLYANAndy Buckley andy.buckley at durham.ac.ukMon Jul 28 19:51:20 BST 2008
Hendrik Hoeth wrote: > So I wonder whether we should write a test suite for all this > little things. Probably a matter of man-power -- some student? It's definitely a manpower thing - test suites would be great for the math classes (and others, but I can't think of a nice way to test projections just yet). The amount of time I've spent fixing apparently trivial functions in the math classes beggars belief! I wouldn't want to give a student a *completely* menial project like that, though it could be part of something else. I don't have any project students next year, though... any MCnetters who could help out with Rivet? Really, testing needs to be part of our standard way of working. That means it has to be relatively painless. So here's an incentive: anyone who devotes a bit of time to looking at e.g. Boost.Test and planning how such a framework could fit into Rivet will have earned themselves a beer or two ;) Andy
More information about the Rivet mailing list |