[Rivet] RE : RE : installation problems (It works!)

[Mikhail Kirsanov]

 I would recommend to set it automatically, example is here:
 $MCGENERATORS/pythia6/418/share/examples/main78.cc
 There is the corresponding possibility also in Herwig installed
in GENSER, if you want I can give you example.
                                         Mikhail



-------- Message d'origine--------
De: James Monk [mailto:jmonk at hep.ucl.ac.uk]
Date: mar. 29/07/2008 17:34
À: Mikhail Kirsanov
Cc: Andy Buckley; Holger Schulz; genser-developers; rivet at projects.hepforge.org
Objet : Re: RE : [Rivet] installation problems (It works!)
 
It gets set as follows by hand:

	HepMC::HEPEVT_Wrapper::set_max_number_entries(10000);
         HepMC::HEPEVT_Wrapper::set_sizeof_real(8);




On 29 Jul 2008, at 16:26, Mikhail Kirsanov wrote:

> Hello,
> Do you set the size of HEPEVT by hands or use the Pythia parameter
> from common blocks?
>                               Mikhail
>
>
> -------- Message d'origine--------
> De: Andy Buckley [mailto:andy.buckley at durham.ac.uk]
> Date: mar. 29/07/2008 17:21
> À: jmonk at hep.ucl.ac.uk
> Cc: Holger Schulz; genser-developers; rivet at projects.hepforge.org
> Objet : Re: [Rivet] installation problems (It works!)
>
> James Monk wrote:
>> I just re-built AGILe against HepMC 2.03.08 and still see the seg
>> fault when running pythia.  The build of HepMC 2.03.08 has not  
>> changed
>> (been re-built etc) in the past few months, has it?
>
> There's one way to tell:
>
> abuckley at lxplus218:~$ llt -d LCGExternal/HepMC/2.03.*
> drwxrwxrwx  8 root root 2.0K Jul 18 17:11 LCGExternal/HepMC/2.03.09
> drwxrwxrwx  7 root root 2.0K Apr 29 01:50 LCGExternal/HepMC/2.03.08
> drwxrwxrwx  8 root root 2.0K Mar 12 22:38 LCGExternal/HepMC/2.03.06
> drwxrwxrwx  7 root root 2.0K Mar  5 13:40 LCGExternal/HepMC/2.03.05
> drwxrwxrwx  8 root root 2.0K Feb  6 02:12 LCGExternal/HepMC/2.03.04
>
> ;)
>
> So it's probably not a problem in HepMC - maybe a memory problem in  
> the
> Pythia/Herwig HEPEVT common blocks that makes HepMC fall over? Could
> this be a problem with common block int sizes etc. again? That was  
> dealt
> with a long time ago, but maybe we accidentally changed something...
>
> Can you try using Rivet HEAD with AGILe 1.1.1, in the interest of
> narrowing it down? I'll try the same.
>
> Andy
>