[Rivet] rivet svn: r1043 - in trunk: include/Rivet/Analyses src/Analyses

[Andy Buckley]

Lars Sonnenschein wrote:
> The ratio plot of the DataPointSet and 
> my externally by ROOT produced ratio plot
> coincide.

Good. I knew we'd get there in the end! ;)

> This partonic boson version of the code I have still to replace by the
> reconstructed final state object code.

I thought that change was already applied?

> But first I have to see if I can distinguish in the plots between
> isolation cut applied/not applied, object pT cuts applied/not applied.
> 
> Since according to the publication it has been corrected for geometrical 
> and kinematical acceptance I would expect that no cuts at all applied 
> would give best agreement.

The defining criterion should be what the paper says rather than which gives
the best agreement. The latter statement is heavily dependent on the chosen
generator tuning.

Andy