|
[Rivet] Running Rivet on the gridAndy Buckley andy.buckley at durham.ac.ukWed Oct 15 12:53:30 BST 2008
Ben Waugh wrote: > Hi All, > > Maybe it's time we had another look at using the CEDAR VO to make better > use of the LCG middleware. The data management side of things seems > rather better developed now than when we first created the VO, and there > may be tools we can use to distribute the required software to any sites > that agree to support CEDAR (which will be at least UCL and Durham I > hope, and probably the other LondonGrid sites) rather than each job > having to download its own set of tarballs. I wonder if using the Pheno VO would be more sensible --- I've copied David (on holiday until Monday) and Peter so they can comment on whether GENSER is fully supported on all Pheno-compatible sites. If so, there seems little point in duplicating the VO management time. Incidentally, is it possible to submit a Grid job under, say, the ATLAS VO with the condition that it must be sent to a CE which supports the Pheno (or CEDAR VO)? Andy -- Dr Andy Buckley Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Durham University 0191 3343798 | 0191 3732613 | www.insectnation.org
More information about the Rivet mailing list |