|
[Rivet] A comment on InvMassFinalStateAdam Davison adamd at hep.ucl.ac.ukWed Jun 10 11:38:44 BST 2009
Hi Frank, Thanks, that's interesting. Just thought I'd let you know what my experience of using it was. Cheers, Adam Frank Siegert wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Adam Davison, Wednesday 10 June 2009: > >> I've been trying to use the InvMassFinalState class but the interface >> seems a bit difficult. It returns all particles that could be used to >> make, for example a Z, excluding duplicates. This means that if there's >> more than one candidate in an event, it can do some wierd things, like >> return a list of 3 or 5 particles. This makes it quite hard to apply >> any further cuts to the candidates, like pt, since in order to identify >> which particles are actually matching pairs, you have to loop over >> everything again anyway. >> > > Yes, I agree that it is awkward, but when I used it (for the ZFinder) I > wasn't brave enough to replace it. Unfortunately there are a few places > which still seem to use it, and I didn't want to validate them after such > a change: > > $ grep InvMassFinalState $(svn ls --recursive) | cut -d ":" -f 1 | uniq > ChangeLog > include/Rivet/Makefile.am > include/Rivet/Projections/InvMassFinalState.hh > src/Analyses/CDF_2006_S6653332.cc > src/Analyses/CDF_2008_S7541902.cc > src/Analyses/CDF_2008_S8095620.cc > src/Analyses/D0_2008_S6879055.cc > src/Projections/InvMassFinalState.cc > src/Projections/Makefile.am > src/Projections/ZFinder.cc > > >> The ZFinder, which is the only place in Rivet I saw this being used >> returns if the size of the list isn't 2. Which unless I've >> misunderstood, potentially throws away events with good Z candidates >> in. >> > > Yes, this is a deliberate choice. If we wanted to pick one of the Z > candidates for each event, we would introduce a bias (for example towards > a known Z mass), so better reject that event. That said, I don't think it > will make much of a difference, because the number of events where enough > leptons pass cuts and form multiple Z's is quite certainly negligible. > > Frank > > >
More information about the Rivet mailing list |