|
[Rivet] normalisation to cross-sectionsFrank Siegert frank.siegert at durham.ac.ukMon Oct 26 10:52:55 GMT 2009
Hendrik Hoeth, Friday 23 October 2009: > Thus spake Andy Buckley (andy.buckley at ed.ac.uk): > > And I think with a concerted effort this can happen very fast after > > the 1.2.0 release... so let's get 1.2.0 out asap, with the same histo > > behaviour as we intend all versions to have, and get working on this > > histo upgrade immediately after. > > I fully agree with this plan (I'm not a fan of that histogram scaling > either, but at least it doesn't involve unneeded cross-sections > anymore). Ok. So I'll revert these changes since it seems a majority is against them. And if YODA is so close, I agree that it wouldn't be worth having a version which behaves differently for a month or two. > > Checking out YODA and testing the statistics of the histo > > combination, getting the I/O to work, etc. would be a BIG step in the > > right direction. > > So can you conduct that concert, please? At least _I_ don't know what > to do and where to start with YODA, but I see that it is important for > us. I feel similar here. If I knew what I could do to get YODA running earlier, I probably would spend time on that instead of interim solutions. But I would appreciate if these plans would contain at least rough time scales, such that I know what and when to expect (and whether I do need (private this time) interim solutions). Cheers, Frank
More information about the Rivet mailing list |