[Rivet] 1.2.0 release?

Hendrik Hoeth hendrik.hoeth at cern.ch
Wed Feb 10 15:13:53 GMT 2010


Thus spake Andy Buckley (andy.buckley at ed.ac.uk):

> > Any other objections to releasing the code as it is?
> 
> Which analyses are checked? Can you put them on the Rivet web pages,
> in parallel to the 1.1.3 release ones?

I didn't run 1.1.3, but some revision between 1.1.3 and now. I ran

   - ALEPH_1996_S3196992
   - ALEPH_1996_S3486095
   - CDF_2000_S4155203
   - CDF_2001_S4751469
   - CDF_2002_S4796047
   - CDF_2004_S5839831
   - CDF_2008_LEADINGJETS
   - CDF_2008_NOTE_9351
   - CDF_2009_S8233977
   - D0_2004_S5992206
   - DELPHI_1995_S3137023
   - DELPHI_1996_S3430090
   - DELPHI_2002_069_CONF_603
   - JADE_OPAL_2000_S4300807
   - OPAL_1998_S3780481
   - OPAL_2004_S6132243
   - PDG_HADRON_MULTIPLICITIES
   - PDG_HADRON_MULTIPLICITIES_RATIOS
   - STAR_2006_S6500200
   - STAR_2006_S6870392
   - STAR_2009_UE_HELEN

through Pythia 6.4 using the profQ2 tune and plots look fine:
http://users.hepforge.org/~hoeth/validation_1.2.0/

Cheers,

    Hendrik

-- 
"Two equal numbers are equivalent, even if they come from two
 different people one of which you don't like"
(MLM about the theoretical top cross-section, in a meeting
about theoretical uncertainties on the top mass)


More information about the Rivet mailing list