|
[Rivet] 1.2.0 release?Hendrik Hoeth hendrik.hoeth at cern.chWed Feb 10 15:13:53 GMT 2010
Thus spake Andy Buckley (andy.buckley at ed.ac.uk): > > Any other objections to releasing the code as it is? > > Which analyses are checked? Can you put them on the Rivet web pages, > in parallel to the 1.1.3 release ones? I didn't run 1.1.3, but some revision between 1.1.3 and now. I ran - ALEPH_1996_S3196992 - ALEPH_1996_S3486095 - CDF_2000_S4155203 - CDF_2001_S4751469 - CDF_2002_S4796047 - CDF_2004_S5839831 - CDF_2008_LEADINGJETS - CDF_2008_NOTE_9351 - CDF_2009_S8233977 - D0_2004_S5992206 - DELPHI_1995_S3137023 - DELPHI_1996_S3430090 - DELPHI_2002_069_CONF_603 - JADE_OPAL_2000_S4300807 - OPAL_1998_S3780481 - OPAL_2004_S6132243 - PDG_HADRON_MULTIPLICITIES - PDG_HADRON_MULTIPLICITIES_RATIOS - STAR_2006_S6500200 - STAR_2006_S6870392 - STAR_2009_UE_HELEN through Pythia 6.4 using the profQ2 tune and plots look fine: http://users.hepforge.org/~hoeth/validation_1.2.0/ Cheers, Hendrik -- "Two equal numbers are equivalent, even if they come from two different people one of which you don't like" (MLM about the theoretical top cross-section, in a meeting about theoretical uncertainties on the top mass)
More information about the Rivet mailing list |