|
[Rivet] [Rivet-svn] r2970 - trunk/binAndy Buckley andy.buckley at ed.ac.ukFri Feb 25 13:06:23 GMT 2011
On 25/02/11 12:31, Frank Siegert wrote: > Hi Hendrik, > > On 25/02/11 12:24, Hendrik Hoeth wrote: >> Thus spake blackhole at projects.hepforge.org >> (blackhole at projects.hepforge.org): >> >>> Author: fsiegert >>> Date: Thu Feb 24 20:05:19 2011 >>> New Revision: 2970 >>> >>> Log: >>> Add nicer sort logic to rivet-mkhtml: Sort analyses by Spires ID and >>> put everything without one at the back >> >> Honest question: Why do you prefer this over the old sorting? > > So I had two goals in mind: > Have newer analyses at the top, and move the MC_* analyses (and as a > side-effect all unpublished analyses) to the bottom. > > Now you would prefer to have the analyses sorted by experiment? I would > argue sorting them by date makes more sense? > > But maybe we can come up with some kind of compromise that meets all goals? I agree with both of you! How about grouping by experiment (interior design micromanagement comment: grouped via a expt-level div with subtle background colour?) and then by "decreasing" date in that group, with the status = preliminary, unvalidated & obsolete analyses explicitly at the end. And group the experiment groups by collider. This would be similar to the groupings used for the analysis PDF & HTML documentation, but with the date ordering reversed for viewing convenience. Andy -- Dr Andy Buckley SUPA Advanced Research Fellow Particle Physics Experiment Group, University of Edinburgh The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
More information about the Rivet mailing list |