[Rivet] Update to ATLAS Rivet routine

[Andrew Pilkington]

Hi Hendrik,

Thanks for spotting that and, yes, it was safe to assume it was a  
mistake.

Regarding testing, the routine itself was tested against pre-existing  
ATLAS MC samples and the results cross-checked with the internal ATLAS  
analysis. It was not tested it on the fly during event generation,  
which I assume is the problem you point out with the info file. It is  
being tested now and we'll get back to you by Thursday if we find  
anything else.

Cheers

Andy

On 30 Jun 2012, at 11:48, Hendrik Hoeth wrote:

> Hi Andy,
>
> Thus spake Andrew Pilkington (Andrew.Pilkington at cern.ch):
>
>> Attached is an update to the ATLAS top-antitop + jet veto analysis
>> routine.
>
> Can I safely assume that your change of center of mass energy from 7  
> TeV
> to 3.5 TeV was not intentional? Makes me wonder ... do you guys  
> actually
> test what you send us?
>
> Cheers,
>
>    Hendrik
>
> -- 
> Man is the best computer we can put aboard a spacecraft, and
> the only one that can be mass produced with unskilled labor.
>                                        -- Wernher von Braun

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
								
  Andy Pilkington					
  IPPP Durham and Manchester

+++++++++++++++++++++++++