|
[Rivet] Rivet: Accessing intermediate particlesDavid Hall David.Hall at physics.ox.ac.ukSat Jun 30 18:43:49 BST 2012
Hi Hendrik, When I look at the parents of the electrons, it just gives me the incoming protons. It does this for >=2 electrons, so not just for electrons from the hard scatter. So it seems I can't differentiate between electrons this way. I agree that in an ideal world we can just treat everything exactly as we would in data. Unfortunately, due to time constraints and deadlines we often need a quick way to do things, so we need to be able to do truth-level studies like this relatively quickly. Thanks, David On Sat 30 Jun 2012 19:25:52 CEST, Hendrik Hoeth wrote: > Hi David, > > Thus spake David Hall (David.Hall at physics.ox.ac.uk): > >> Unfortunately, when I check the status of each parent of the electron >> in an event, I find that they are _all_ status 2. This suggests that >> all the electrons are from decays, but I know this shouldn't be the >> case. Two should be from the hard scatter. Is it possible this is >> specific to Sherpa? > > Well, technically even in the hard scatter the electrons are decay > products of something. Though luck, eh? I mean ... > >>>> I understand the philosophy behind Rivet not providing access to the >>>> intermediate particles, but I believe that looking for the particles >>> >from the hard process in this way is not _so_ bad. :-) > > ... nature doesn't mark the particles from the hard process, either. So > the best thing is to resort to physically meaningful observables, > similar to what you do in the experiment. > > Cheers, > > Hendrik > > PS: I assume you know you can walk through the whole HepMC tree in the > same way you asked for the electrons' parents. That's all the generator > supplies. >
More information about the Rivet mailing list |