[Rivet] Rivet dev sprint session

[Leif Lönnblad]

Well, when I talked to Gavin he mentioned the FastJet manual as an 
example: Eur.Phys.J. C72 (2012) 1896 (arXiv:1111.6097). As far as I can 
see, this is a pure manual without very much physics discussion. Note 
that they even got around the two-column restriction. Of course, Gavin 
being one of the editors, maybe they got some special treatment ;o)

/Leif



On 2012-10-05 10:54, Frank Siegert wrote:
> I can definitely be convinced to go with EPJC Tools rather than
> Elsevier-CPC if it is clarified a priori that the scope of the Rivet
> manual is suitable for it. I would be opposed if we have to beef it up
> with more physics content (discussion of analyses, generator
> comparisons, ...) since that is not the purpose of this manual. One
> disadvantage of EPJC is its two-column layout, but if somebody
> volunteers to re-linebreak all our \kbd inputs then that's going to be
> fine ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Frank
> _______________________________________________
> Rivet mailing list
> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
> http://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>