[Rivet] Making prelim/unvalidated Rivet ATLAS analyses "proper"

Roman Lysak lysak at fzu.cz
Mon Dec 2 09:26:44 GMT 2013


  Hi Andy,

sorry for the late response, yes, we will check all of the analyses below.

Roman


On 11/24/2013 09:22 PM, Andy Buckley wrote:
> Hi Roman and Kiran,
>
> I'm just in the process of making the long-awaited Rivet 1.8.4 release,
> which includes several of the "new" and updated analysis codes that you
> provided. Sorry about the delay, but what manpower we had went into
> getting version 2 out (and the Athena interface will be updated to use
> that fairly soon after the 1.8.4 update).
>
> As well as the new analyses that you supplied, and whatever is in the
> pipeline right now, I noticed that we actually have a big collection of
> ATLAS analyses in Rivet which are either marked as preliminary or
> unvalidated:
>
> if ENABLE_PRELIMINARY
> RivetATLASAnalyses_la_SOURCES += \
>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_001.cc
> endif
> if ENABLE_UNVALIDATED
> RivetATLASAnalyses_la_SOURCES += \
>      ATLAS_2010_CONF_2010_049.cc \
>      ATLAS_2011_S9041966.cc \
>      ATLAS_2011_CONF_2011_090.cc \
>      ATLAS_2011_CONF_2011_098.cc \
>      ATLAS_2011_S9108483.cc \
>      ATLAS_2011_S9212353.cc \
>      ATLAS_2011_S9035664.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_I1083318.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_I1095236.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_I1082009.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_I946427.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_I1126136.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_I1180197.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_I1186556.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_I1190891.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_103.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_104.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_105.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_109.cc \
>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_153.cc
> endif
>
> That's an excerpt from the Rivet build file, so you can see that these
> don't get installed by default, e.g. in the Genser build of Rivet that
> we use in ATLAS. So it would be good to get the prelim one (and the
> unvalidated CONF note ones) updated to match the final published forms,
> and for as many of the other unvalidated ones as possible to be checked
> and made official. Could you see what you can do about that? Hopefully
> an easy way to get a few more happy green boxes on your Rivet-ATLAS
> implementation table ;-)
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>



More information about the Rivet mailing list