|
[Rivet] Some make-plots suggestionsFrank Siegert frank.siegert at cern.chThu Jan 31 15:06:49 GMT 2013
On 29 January 2013 15:12, Frank Siegert <frank.siegert at cern.ch> wrote: > > Back when I wrote rivet-mkhtml, I added the "--full-range" for each > call to make-plots. The reason was that the default automatic y range > is typically too small for LHC plots, it does not even display four > orders of magnitude (ymin=2e-4*ymax). Do we still consider this our > best default? I wonder whether we could change this to e.g. > ymin=2e-7*ymax, in which case it would also make sense to get rid of > the default --full-range in rivet-mkhtml. If there are any objections > with respect to backwards compatibility of make-plots, maybe we could > make this a command line parameter replacing/amending the --full-range > option? No opinions? Hendrik, no objections because of compatibility? In that case I would go ahead with the proposed change. > On another note, I was wondering how complicated (and desirable) it > would be to have the legend items right-alignable. I think it would > make sense because the legend is positioned in the top right corner by > default, and with a right-aligned legend there would be less overlap > with the plot. In particular, the coloured lines/errorbands/markers in > the legend should be on the right-hand side then, which would avoid > even more the confusion with the actual data. And it's much more > flexible with respect to long or short legend entries. Hendrik, do you > think the pstricks for that would be very complicated, or have you > possibly even implemented something like that before? I have added this option to make-plots on SVN now with the hopefully obvious syntax: LegendAlign={l,r} I've left "l" (left) as the default for the time being, but if there's a consensus for "r" as default then I'd be happy to change that. Cheers, Frank
More information about the Rivet mailing list |