[Rivet] LHC analysis database

[Peter Richardson]

HI Hendrik,

   It's not clear to me either and I raised that point. I think we(you) 
should have a discussion with them. I think Ben Fuks and Andy Weiler are 
reasonable people and we can work with them to come up with a good 
solution. It mainly seems to be an issue of storing their efficiency maps 
in some way.

Peter

On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Hendrik Hoeth wrote:

> Thus spake Peter Richardson (peter.richardson at durham.ac.uk):
>
>> They seem to be determined not to use rivet as they don't want
>> to be bothered to code the efficiencies they need as the data is not
>> corrected into a rivet analysis,
>
> So ... if they don't take the efficiencies into account, they can't
> compare to MC. If the take the efficiencies into account, what
> difference does it make for them to code them in Rivet or somewhere
> else? I can't see the drawback of using Rivet.
>
>