[Rivet] Rivet "collaboration meeting"?

[Hendrik Hoeth]

Thus spake David Grellscheid (david.grellscheid at durham.ac.uk):

> sounds interesting. I'd love to talk to them to convince them that
> Pseudo-Sims are not a good idea :-) And to show them what we've already
> done with Valya. But like James I'm not sure the Rivet meeting fits for
> that.
> 
> I'd also like to ask them if they'd contribute the ~80 analyses they
> talk about.

All this reminds me of Sezen Sekmen's and Sabine Kraml's talk at the
DASPOS/DPHEP data preservation meeting at CERN in March. They have
"started efforts on building an analysis code database where analysis
code written by phenomenologists can be collected [and] are also working
on a common format for such analysis codes". Their "main issue [with
Rivet] is that Rivet is in principle for unfolded data. BSM results are
however not unfolded, and will not be in the foreseeable future."

I'd *LOVE* to write them back saying that there are about 80 BSM
analyses in Rivet!!!

-- 
If your dreams don't scare you, then you are not dreaming big enough.