[Rivet] Rivet Analysis for Z+jets still not publicly available

[Ulla Blumenschein]

Hello Andy,

Many thanks for the feedback and for the support.
Any expert who is member of Atlas or STA can use the preliminary
internal versions but the outside world will browse the official rivet
pages.

Best,
Ulla



On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch> wrote:
> Both are in my (development) version of Rivet 1.9.0 which will be
> released as soon as the validation runs have finished. They're both
> marked as VALIDATED.
>
> I'm not sure about availability in previous versions (because my
> installation is the development head) but there was an unfortunately
> long gap when submitted analyses built up because out limited manpower
> was focused on getting version 2.0.0 finished: sorry about that.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
>
> On 29/11/13 21:17, Roman Lysak wrote:
>>
>>  Dear Ulla,
>>
>> the 2011 analysis is already in Rivet:
>>
>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/browser/src/Analyses/ATLAS_2013_I1230812.cc
>>
>> Regarding ATLAS_2011_I945498, this was validated and I already sent it
>> to rivet authors (cc-ing) some time ago.
>> As far as I know, there should be a new rivet release tagged very soon,
>> so I guess it will appear in it then (the Rivet authors could comment
>> maybe).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Roman
>>
>>
>> On 11/29/2013 08:47 PM, Ulla Blumenschein wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> The 2010 Analysis still appears as unvalidated in the official Rivet
>>> page:
>>> http://rivet.hepforge.org/analyses#ATLAS_2011_I945498
>>>
>>> The 2011 analysis, ATLAS_2013_I1230812,  doesn't appear at all in the
>>> official page
>>>
>>> Are these analyses now in a public release?
>>> Can you please tell me  whom to contact to  finalize the integration
>>> into a public release and the display in the official rivet page?
>>>
>>> Many thanks in advance,
>>> Ulla
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Frank Siegert
>>> <frank.siegert at cern.ch> wrote:
>>>> Hi Roman, all,
>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder whether we even still need the "old" analysis, given that the
>>>>>> new one operates at the same energy and simply has much more
>>>>>> statistics?
>>>>> physics wise probably not , but I'm not sure what's yours (i.e. Rivet
>>>>> authors) policy, e.g. whether you remove any analysis from Rivet
>>>>> after some
>>>>> time, etc.
>>>>> Anyway, I already fixed the analysis and sent to rivet mailing list.
>>>> Ok, thanks. There is no removal after a certain time, only if it
>>>> remains unvalidated. But I agree with Ulla's point to keep this
>>>> analysis alive.
>>>>
>>>>>> As soon as Katharina has confirmed which email address she wants to
>>>>>> see used in the info files I can commit it directly (or you can send
>>>>>> it to Rivet and I take it from there, either is fine for me).
>>>>> I'm o.k. with you directly commit the analysis.
>>>>> Once you do this, let us know the revision number (we keep it on our
>>>>> web
>>>>> page, mainly to make sure the analysis we sent to rivet was really
>>>>> included
>>>>> in there).
>>>> This is done now, both on Rivet trunk (2.x):
>>>>
>>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/1b56f3cb68de5f7a52e845aa240caac3247b88d6/
>>>>
>>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/18c076e33bf6de6d1be9a154bcf745488846f55d/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and the aida branch (1.8.x):
>>>>
>>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/adec40756f76f07e6113e52ac96d6cd0892ed3e3/
>>>>
>>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/d4175dbb5f1ca7bde764322710145e98f99e634e/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (two commits each, because I forgot a few files in the first commits)
>>>> The changeset ID in which all of this is included is 4140:18c076e33bf6.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr Andy Buckley, Royal Society University Research Fellow
> Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow / PH Dept, CERN



-- 
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
    Ulla Blumenschein
    II Physik, Uni Goettingen
    Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, D01.110
    phone: 0049-551-397645
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/