|
[Rivet] Born and dressed level in RivetTim Martin tim.martin at cern.chThu Oct 3 16:56:19 BST 2013
Hi Ulla, He might be able to. I'm not sure what Oleg's setup is / how trivial this would be in terms of development and grid time. If there is still found to be a a non-negligible difference between only-FSR-photons and photons-without-status-2-hadron-or-tau-parent then this new definition may not be deemed a useful enough addition to warrant the change, but honestly - how many other photon sources are there which could get us here! :) Cheers, Tim. On 3 October 2013 16:44, Ulla Blumenschein <ublumenschein at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > would Oleg also be able to plot the difference btw FSR only and the > new proposed definition for high sumpT and high ZpT? > > Cheers, > Ulla > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Tim Martin <tim.martin at cern.ch> wrote: >> Thanks, >> >> A flag in the W/ZFinder constructor which is passed on to >> ClusteredPhotons sounds like a good solution to me. Giving the option >> to use this slightly more involved but more technically correct >> version excluding photons from hadronisation and beyond. >> >> We could then reassess on a case-by-case basis if we want to modify >> some of our current Rivet analyses which corrected to a only FSR >> photons definition. >> >> Oleg has shown the difference between all photons and FSR only can be >> up to ~3% in some variables for more extreme phases spaces, so high >> pTz or with around 100 GeV of hadronic activity in the vicinity of the >> Z. >> >> Thanks, Tim. >> >> On 3 October 2013 16:28, Ulla Blumenschein <ublumenschein at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Andy, >>> >>> Many thanks for the feedback. >>> Yes, what you detail sounds as good as we can get. >>> Excluding the photons from any hadron decay chain, would be desirable. >>> >>> We would have to talk to SM subconveners and conveners of course to >>> discuss the approach. >>> As far as I know Oleg is running on standard evgen files or even >>> ntuples, so I think he has all the flexibility to mimick both >>> definitions, I hope. >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Ulla >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch> wrote: >>>> On 03/10/13 17:00, Ulla Blumenschein wrote: >>>>> Dear Andy, >>>>> >>>>> I would be very happy if that works out. >>>>> I cc to Oleg and Tim, who did a comparison of various dressing >>>>> definitions recently. >>>>> Maybe Oleg would be interested to reproduce his plots with the >>>>> proposed new Rivet implementation, to check what the residual effect >>>>> is of the missing " from W/Z" requirement. >>>> >>>> I can certainly tell you how to hack an existing Rivet version to do >>>> that. It's a bit low-level, though, so not obvious to me how it would be >>>> done inside a particular analysis. But contact me/us and we'll do what >>>> we can to help. >>>> >>>>> I have a technical question: Would only photons dircetly from >>>>> quarkonia decays be excluded? Where would photons from leptons from >>>>> semileptonic HF decays end up? >>>> >>>> Our fromDecay(Particle&) function walks back up the decay chain looking >>>> for a parent hadron or tau with status=2, meaning "physical hadron/tau >>>> which has already been decayed". (Note the double specification: PYTHIA6 >>>> predates the standard status codes so we overspecify!) So photons from >>>> charmonia and from hadron decay leptons would count as being from >>>> decays: I assume that is what you want? Special case treatments for >>>> these would take more coding, but if it'll be needed then we should know >>>> now: at the very least this would indicate that the steering flag needs >>>> to have more states than a bool would allow! >>>> >>>> Of course this would mean that the ClusteredPhotons projection would >>>> need to be configured differently for charmonia analyses than for W/Z >>>> ones, but that is hardly surprising. And we can leave the flag as >>>> "include all" by default on ClusteredPhotons, but turn it to "non-decay >>>> only" by default for the W/ZFinders. Sound good? >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Ulla, all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've discussed this a bit with Daniel Froidevaux and think that it would >>>>>> make sense for us to at least add a flag to the ClusteredPhotons tool in >>>>>> Rivet to exclude photons which come from hadron decays. Taus are a bit >>>>>> of a borderline case, but that does not affect (current) EW measurements. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is not *exactly* the same definition, but I think that "only >>>>>> photons from W/Z" is hard to implement in a generator-unspecific way. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe Frank Siegert wants to comment more on this proposal to use the >>>>>> fromDecay() function in ClusteredPhotons, since he did most of the >>>>>> detailed work to put these W/ZFinders and related classes together. >>>>>> >>>>>> Re. the Born comparisons, I believe that the ATLAS W/Z analyses written >>>>>> so far *don't* compare to the Born-level results, since there *isn't* a >>>>>> generator-portable way to write them. I remember removing a >>>>>> generator-specific code along those lines in a previously submitted >>>>>> analysis for that reason: it's fine for ATLAS-internal versions of >>>>>> analyses but won't go into the public Rivet library. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hope that helps, >>>>>> Andy >>>>>> >>>>>> PS. For those who care, if we agree that that is a reasonable route, I >>>>>> propose that the exclude-decay-photons functionality would go into Rivet >>>>>> 2.0.1 or 2.0.2. The exact version depends on the extent to which we want >>>>>> to separate different types of change -- 2.0.1 might just be adding some >>>>>> "queued" analysis codes, or it could be a combination of that and some >>>>>> definition changes. The numbering does not really reflect anything about >>>>>> the timescales! But note that we'll only be making this change in the >>>>>> Rivet 2 series -- 1.x is in "maintenance mode". >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 03/10/13 14:51, Roman Lysak wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Ulla, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think the Rivet authors are better to replay to your questions so I'm >>>>>>> cc-ing this to them. >>>>>>> Could anyone address Ulla's questions? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Roman >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/03/2013 12:25 PM, Ulla Blumenschein wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Roman, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> we have currently a discussion in SM about how to synchronize the >>>>>>>> Atlas internal definition of dressed leptons with the Rivet >>>>>>>> implementation. >>>>>>>> Currently in SM, we sum all photons emitted from the W/Z decay >>>>>>>> products whereas Rivet sums all photons. >>>>>>>> With the extreme phase spaces which we access with 8TeV there are >>>>>>>> differences up to percentage level between these definitions due to >>>>>>>> pi0 decays from hadronic activity close to leptons. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is it possible to implemet an alternate Z finder which can >>>>>>>> discriminate photon sources? I understand that this might be against >>>>>>>> the philosophy of Rivet (MC independence). Or are there other >>>>>>>> problems? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also the born level Z finder is not completely clear to me. I assumed >>>>>>>> so far that the born level is defined by different status codes in >>>>>>>> different MC generator, so how does Rivet handle this issue? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Many thanks in advance, >>>>>>>> Ulla >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Roman Lysak <lysak at fzu.cz> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Ulla, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 09/12/2013 06:51 PM, Ulla Blumenschein wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi Roman, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Could you explain how we define Born and dressed in a generator >>>>>>>>>> independent way in Rivet? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> it depends on the object type. >>>>>>>>> For example, for Z boson (similarly for W boson), you can specify >>>>>>>>> whether to >>>>>>>>> add photons (next to last one parameter in the constructor below) in >>>>>>>>> a given >>>>>>>>> radius (2nd next to last one parameter) around the leptons from Z >>>>>>>>> decay to >>>>>>>>> the Z boson 4-momentum. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> //fiducial phase space + born level >>>>>>>>> ZFinder zfinder_mu(-2.4, 2.4, 20, MUON, 66.0*GeV, 116.0*GeV, 0.1, >>>>>>>>> false, false); >>>>>>>>> addProjection(zfinder_mu, "ZFinder_mu"); >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> //for combined cross-sections (combined phase space + dressed >>>>>>>>> level) >>>>>>>>> ZFinder zfinder_comb_mu(-2.5, 2.5, 20, MUON, 66.0*GeV, >>>>>>>>> 116.0*GeV, 0.1, >>>>>>>>> true, false); >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sorry for late response. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Roman >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Ulla >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ >>>>>>>>>> Ulla Blumenschein >>>>>>>>>> II Physik, Uni Goettingen >>>>>>>>>> Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, D01.110 >>>>>>>>>> phone: 0049-551-397645 >>>>>>>>>> /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Rivet mailing list >>>>>>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org >>>>>>> http://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dr Andy Buckley, Royal Society University Research Fellow >>>>>> Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow / PH Dept, CERN >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr Andy Buckley, Royal Society University Research Fellow >>>> Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow / PH Dept, CERN >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ >>> Ulla Blumenschein >>> II Physik, Uni Goettingen >>> Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, D01.110 >>> phone: 0049-551-397645 >>> /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ >> >> >> >> -- >> -+-+-+-+ Tim Martin +-+ ATLAS +-+-+-+- >> Room 448A, University of Warwick, CV47AL >> Tel: (+44) 0-24761-51769 >> Web: http://Tim-Martin.co.uk > > > > -- > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ > Ulla Blumenschein > II Physik, Uni Goettingen > Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, D01.110 > phone: 0049-551-397645 > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ -- -+-+-+-+ Tim Martin +-+ ATLAS +-+-+-+- Room 448A, University of Warwick, CV47AL Tel: (+44) 0-24761-51769 Web: http://Tim-Martin.co.uk
More information about the Rivet mailing list |