|
[Rivet] Move bootstrap into main repository for versioning?Frank Siegert frank.siegert at cern.chThu Feb 6 11:37:47 GMT 2014
Thanks, David. The separation rivet<->bootstrap sounds reasonable, although I was a bit worried about the hg "overhead" involved. But since I'm usually not the one doing the releases I probably won't have to worry about creating the release branches of the bootstrap script. I assume we will create new bootstrap release branches for every Rivet release even if the script didn't need any changes, right? I have updated GettingStarted now, and at that time found it a bit strange to have a 2.0.0/rivet-2-bootstrap script. Should we take this opportunity to sort this into 2.0.0/rivet-bootstrap 2.0.0/rivet-bootstrap-lcg 1.9.0/rivet-bootstrap-lcg ? If you agree, I'm happy to update the GettingStarted page, but it would be best if you could do the hg re-organisation as I would probably fail to move something from one branch to another without messing it up. Cheers, Frank On 6 February 2014 11:58, David Grellscheid <david.grellscheid at durham.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Frank, > >> The current revision (ef0f9730654d) is fine for 2.0.0. Let me know >> once you have tagged it > > Done, it's a named branch to allow... > >> a bugfix on such a tag in case we notice something that is missing > > So as usual we need to make sure we check in things on the right branch! > The default branch can now lose all functionality needed for 2.0.0 > compatibility. > > The download URL is > > http://rivet.hepforge.org/hg/bootstrap/raw-file/2.0.0/rivet-2-bootstrap > >> Is there any benefit in having the bootstrap in a separate repo with >> manual tagging instead of in the main Rivet repo and thus >> automatically tagged? > > Yes, I think it does not belong _inside_ Rivet. It's something external > that needs bugfixes independently of the main Rivet tags. > > See you, > > David
More information about the Rivet mailing list |