|
[Rivet] Weights in RivetStefano Frixione frixione at mail.cern.chMon Oct 20 15:03:46 BST 2014
Hi Andy, so I gather that the short answer for *existing* Rivet analysis is "no"? Concerning: > It would be great if you could let us know how you would like them to be > used by default: our plan at the moment is that we write out N copies of > every histogram as a weight-variation, and build some logic into our > default plotting tools to turn these groups of variations into displayed > error bands. This requires that we can clearly identify the groups and > tell how to combine them... which is specified at the LHE level, but not > the HepMC one -- right? So the first version might be a bit approximate, > e.g. always a min-max envelope rather than sometimes a 68% interval, > sometimes a quadrature sum, etc. in my opinion, plotting directly the error bands is error prone and not particularly flexible. It is fine, but one should *also* get a copy of all desired histograms for each of the scale and PDF choices, so that a-posteriori manipulations could be done by the user. For example, you may want a scale error band that corresponds to all N*N choices, another one thar results only from setting muF=muR, and so forth. Likewise, one may want to experiment with PDF combinations. Needless to say, I'm open to suggestions. Best wishes, Stefano.
More information about the Rivet mailing list |