|
[Rivet] ATLAS_2014_I1304688 - fix for total data uncertaintyHolger Schulz holger.schulz at durham.ac.ukMon Jul 13 13:57:13 BST 2015
On 13/07/15 13:53, Alexander Grohsjean wrote: > Hi Holger, > > as far as I know ATLAS didn't provide yet any input to HEPData, > separately. > There is also no automatic sharing between Rivet and HEPData, right? You could call it semi-automatic as I could just go downstairs to Graeme Watt :) I'll let him know and forward him your file. Thanks, Holger > > Cheers, Alexander. > > > > Am 13.07.2015 um 14:22 schrieb Holger Schulz: >> On 13/07/15 13:17, Alexander Grohsjean wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> updating our paper for final journal publication, we realized a >>> small mistake in the data uncertainties >>> of the provided Rivet routine. Unfortunately, we added the >>> statistical uncertainties twice. >>> As the stat uncertainty is very small, it is basically invisible. >>> The routine itself was checked on an event-by-event basis, getting >>> perfect agreement with the >>> original analysis. >>> We hope you can update the data file for the next release. The >>> effect is very tiny and has >>> no practical consequence. I know that it was already used for some >>> ATLAS tuning, but I checked with >>> the analyzers that they are not affected. >>> >>> Sorry for any inconvenience and your help, >>> >> Hi Alexander, >> >> no problem, thanks for letting us know. I update the data file in the >> repository. >> >> Don't forget to also notify hepdata, please. >> >> Thanks, >> Holger >> >> >>> Alexander. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rivet mailing list >>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org >>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.hepforge.org/lists-archive/rivet/attachments/20150713/5f52dfa8/attachment.html>
More information about the Rivet mailing list |