[Rivet] ATLAS_2014_I1304688 - fix for total data uncertainty

Holger Schulz holger.schulz at durham.ac.uk
Mon Jul 13 13:57:13 BST 2015


On 13/07/15 13:53, Alexander Grohsjean wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> as far as I know ATLAS didn't provide yet any input to HEPData, 
> separately.
> There is also no automatic sharing between Rivet and HEPData, right?
You could call it semi-automatic as I could just go downstairs to Graeme 
Watt :)

I'll let him know and forward him your file.

Thanks,
Holger
>
> Cheers, Alexander.
>
>
>
> Am 13.07.2015 um 14:22 schrieb Holger Schulz:
>> On 13/07/15 13:17, Alexander Grohsjean wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> updating our paper for final journal publication, we realized a 
>>> small mistake in the data uncertainties
>>> of the provided Rivet routine. Unfortunately, we added the 
>>> statistical uncertainties twice.
>>> As the stat uncertainty is very small, it is basically invisible.
>>> The routine itself was checked on an event-by-event basis, getting 
>>> perfect agreement with the
>>> original analysis.
>>> We hope you can update the data file for the next release. The 
>>> effect is very tiny and has
>>> no practical consequence. I know that it was already used for some 
>>> ATLAS tuning, but I checked  with
>>> the analyzers that they are not affected.
>>>
>>> Sorry for any inconvenience and your help,
>>>
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> no problem, thanks for letting us know. I update the data file in the 
>> repository.
>>
>> Don't forget to also notify hepdata, please.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Holger
>>
>>
>>> Alexander.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rivet mailing list
>>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
>>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.hepforge.org/lists-archive/rivet/attachments/20150713/5f52dfa8/attachment.html>


More information about the Rivet mailing list