|
[Rivet] Rivet 2.4 and xsec/event counter informationDavid Grellscheid david.grellscheid at durham.ac.ukTue Nov 10 11:12:39 GMT 2015
On 10/11/15 10:44, Andy Buckley wrote: > On 10/11/15 09:02, David Grellscheid wrote: >> Won't that still work? Let's say you originally have events numbered >> >> E 1 ... >> E 452 ... >> E 1642 ... >> >> and you leave out the middle one, you still get the correct "number of >> attempts" from the third event. [...] > Because of this, maybe the min event number should be written into a > header, or runs always declared to start at 1. I'm not sure if the > latter would work for experiment procedures, but I *think* it is > currently the case in ATLAS. The count of attempts needs to be defined to start at one, but the first event written is almost never 'E 1'. David
More information about the Rivet mailing list |