[Rivet] CMS_2015_I1370682.tgz

[David Grellscheid]

Hi Andy,

> That way the .cc file remains a self-contained implementation of the
> analysis,

That's fine. We will definitely need the namespacing then. I agree that 
having local copies in each analysis avoids a lot of versioning 
headaches, but this...

> and does not require e.g. to be used with a version of Rivet
> new enough to contain CMS_PseudoTop_2015.

... I think is a fiction ;-) I don't think we've got many analyses that 
were compatible backwards from the point they were introduced.

The code review is orthogonal to this question and needs to happen 
either way. Is there any code yet?

   David