|
[Rivet] MissingMomentum and WFinder problem & plans for 2.4.0Chris Pollard cpollard at cern.chTue Sep 15 09:09:07 BST 2015
I'm in favor of only exposing the MissingMomentum 3-momentum. I also agree that setting the neutrino mass to zero when solving for the W mass is the right way to go, although David G should comment on whether this would break BSM reinterpretations. Chris On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch> wrote: > Hi all, > > A summer student working with Chris and I spotted last week that the W > returned from WFinder is still nonsensical. > > The cuts are ok, and the lepton is also fine, but the use of the full 4D > missing ET vector to make the "pseudo-neutrino" messes up because that > vector has an energy component equal to the energy sum of all the > in-acceptance particles used to calculated the *visible* momentum against > which the missing one is balanced. > > One option would be to reduce the MissingMomentum to the transverse vector > only, but that seems too far because it should also be usable in e+e- > colliders. It also seems wrong to give the missing momentum vector a null > mass, because while that's fine for neutrinos it's wrong for BSM invisibles. > > I suggest that we change the MissingMomentum interface (again... I already > made some enhancements for 2.4.0) to only expose a 3-momentum. The E > component is really a misleading accident. What do you think? Any > objections or alternative suggestions? (A user-specified missing momentum > mass target, maybe?) > > Similarly, we can't just restrict the WFinder to use transverse mass due > to e+e- compatibility. But there we do have a definite hypothesis that the > missing momentum vector should be a neutrino, so we could set the pseudo-nu > mass to zero, and feed that into the pseudo-W mass in the case that full > rather than transverse mass is used. Again, thoughts? > > Andy > > PS. Still waiting for analysis integration volunteers. I'll start forcibly > assigning them if I don't hear soon (this is the procedure we agreed on!), > so this is your chance to take a quick look at the tarballs and pick a > couple of easy ones ;-) > > -- > Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow > Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow > _______________________________________________ > Rivet mailing list > Rivet at projects.hepforge.org > https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.hepforge.org/lists-archive/rivet/attachments/20150915/73dd09ba/attachment.html>
More information about the Rivet mailing list |