[Rivet] Work for Rivet 2.4.0 release: call for contributions!

[Chris Pollard]

Hi all,

Is there any objection to going ahead and merging 2-3-x into default,
closing 2-3-x, and creating 2-4-x? There is at least one non-trivial
difference between 2-3-x and default: it took me a while to realize that
Jet::bTagged() only has the optional Cut argument on the default branch. In
this case we should be checking the new analyses against the version *with*
the optional Cut argument, correct?

Chris

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Holger Schulz <holger.schulz at durham.ac.uk>
wrote:

> On 28/09/15 15:34, Andy Buckley wrote:
>
>> No, it's uploaded to contrib but not in the Rivet code yet... that's your
>> job ;-)
>>
> I just ran 100k sherpa events lo, no shenanigans and Chris P. Bacon and I
> agree that this
> looks very good. So I consider this thing validated.
>
> Holger
>
>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On 28/09/15 14:58, Holger Schulz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> sorry for being a bit slow.
>>>
>>> Does that mean that CMS_2013_I1122847 is ticked off the things that need
>>> to be done already?
>>>
>>> Holger
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28/09/15 14:16, Xavier Janssen wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> yes, ofc. VALIDATED
>>>> Xavier.
>>>>
>>>> On 28 Sep 2015, at 18:26, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch
>>>>> <mailto:andy.buckley at cern.ch>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Excellent; thank you Xavier.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have merged the two new analyses into our codebase. I assume that
>>>>> the .info file for CMS_2015_I1385107 was meant to be marked as
>>>>> VALIDATED rather than UNVALIDATED? The two analyses were both in very
>>>>> good shape -- I just did a bit of minor LaTeX and code tidying. Keep
>>>>> 'em coming like that, please!
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28/09/15 11:17, Xavier Janssen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> OK, we found back the code for CMS_2013_I1122847.
>>>>>> I have put the tar file in contrib as usual.
>>>>>> Cheers, Xavier.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 28 Sep 2015, at 02:45, Frank Siegert <frank.siegert at cern.ch
>>>>>>> <mailto:frank.siegert at cern.ch>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Holger
>>>>>>>>  CMS_2013_I1122847  (missing since 2.3.0 cf. Xavier's email)
>>>>>>>>  D0_2000_I503361.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  --> cf. the clarifications asked for in the submission thread. I
>>>>>>> think if this cannot be clarified, we don't have to hold the release
>>>>>>> for this one analysis.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Rivet mailing list
>>>>>>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org <mailto:Rivet at projects.hepforge.org>
>>>>>>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow
>>>>> Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Rivet mailing list
>>>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
>>>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Rivet mailing list
> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.hepforge.org/lists-archive/rivet/attachments/20150928/6afec83f/attachment.html>