[Rivet] 1102.4748

Roberto Franceschini franceschini.roberto at gmail.com
Mon Aug 15 17:35:46 BST 2016


Dear Andy
Thanks for letting me know! as I will put my hands back on Herwig I will try to update its Rivet and to run fragmented ee->bb into this new analysis.
Thanks again!
Roberto




> On 14 ago 2016, at 22:31, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch> wrote:
> 
> Hi Roberto,
> 
> For your information, this analysis appeared in Rivet 2.5.1 as DELPHI_2011_I890503. Please let us know if you spot any issues.
> 
> Andy & co
> 
> 
>> On 10/05/16 17:03, roberto franceschini wrote:
>> Absolutely, thanks a lot! And please give me a hint in case at that time
>> I will be better at rivet I would be glad to help.
>> Roberto
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch
>> <mailto:andy.buckley at cern.ch>> wrote:
>> 
>>    Thanks for the input Roberto. We'll try to get this in as soon as
>>    possible, and I'll try to be back in touch when some progress is made.
>> 
>>    Andy
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    On 10/05/16 08:22, Roberto Franceschini wrote:
>> 
>>        Dear Andy,
>>           thanks for replying. In a sense this a legacy analysis, so it
>>        is important to have it.  I think is possible some might say
>>        that SLD fragmentation results are good enough for MC tuning
>>        today, still this analysis seems to be the more complete as it
>>        has considered all other previous measurements (including SLD).
>>        In doing that they introduce correlations and all that so it
>>        might be good if some authors of the paper are involved.
>>        Concerning my involvement, I would not exclude it, as I am
>>        always interested to see how the sausage is made, but I should
>>        mention I have no idea about how rivet works.
>>        Best,
>>        Roberto
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>            On 10 mag 2016, at 01:38, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch
>>            <mailto:andy.buckley at cern.ch>> wrote:
>> 
>>            Hi Roberto,
>> 
>>            We don't have an active "pipeline" for reimplementation of
>>            old analyses, the focus having moved more to the current
>>            experiments supplying them along with publication. But this
>>            would definitely be good to have... I'll see what we can do.
>>            Unless you would like to implement it?
>> 
>>            Andy
>> 
>> 
>>                On 05/05/16 12:59, roberto franceschini wrote:
>>                Hello,
>>                  I think 1102.4748 is not in the list of implemented
>>                analyses and I was
>>                wondering if it somewhere in the pipeline or not. Is the
>>                final word of
>>                LEP on b fragmentation, therefore is sort of superseding
>>                SLD_2002_S4869273 and DELPHI_ 2002_ 069_CONF _ 603.
>>                Thanks for your reply,
>>                Roberto
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>                _______________________________________________
>>                Rivet mailing list
>>                Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
>>                <mailto:Rivet at projects.hepforge.org>
>>                https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>            --
>>            Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University
>>            Research Fellow
>>            Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    --
>>    Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow
>>    Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow
> Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow


More information about the Rivet mailing list