|
[Rivet] Memory errorAndy Buckley andy.buckley at cern.chMon Oct 17 15:47:19 BST 2016
On 17/10/16 15:29, Alan Kaptanoglu wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to declare jets with area in the initialization section of > my Rivet Analysis. I originally tried: > > fastjet::GhostedAreaSpec areaspec(2.5,1,0.01); > fastjet::AreaDefinition > area_def(fastjet::active_area_explicit_ghosts,areaspec); > FastJets jets(vfs, FastJets::ANTIKT, Rsmall); > jets.useJetArea(area_def); > jets.useInvisibles(JetAlg::ALL_INVISIBLES); > jets.useMuons(JetAlg::DECAY_MUONS); > declare(jets, "jets"); > > but this definition goes out of scope so when I ask for jet areas in my > "analysis" section of my code, it complains the jets have no valid jet > area associated with them. I next tried several versions of: > > areaspec = new fastjet::GhostedAreaSpec(2.5,1,0.01); > area_def = new > fastjet::AreaDefinition(fastjet::active_area_explicit_ghosts,*areaspec); > FastJets jets(vfs, FastJets::ANTIKT, Rsmall); > jets.useJetArea(area_def); > jets.useInvisibles(JetAlg::ALL_INVISIBLES); > jets.useMuons(JetAlg::DECAY_MUONS); > declare(jets, "jets"); > > where areaspec and area_def are private members of my Analysis class. I > also tried initializing these variables in my constructor using > initialization lists, as well as declaring them global variables (and > yes, to my knowledge, I am also deleting them correctly if I use "new"). > In all these cases, the code runs correctly but complains at the end of > a memory error, which is attached in a text file. Any idea why this is > happening or how to fix? Hi Alan, The AreaDefinition provided to FastJets must be a heap-allocated pointer whose ownership is then taken over by the FastJets object: it will delete the pointer at the end of the run so you shouldn't try to do that yourself. (This is documented on the useJetArea() function) To this end I usually make sure that I don't have a variable of my own pointing at that area def objects, e.g. fj.useJetArea(new fastjet::AreaDefinition(fastjet::VoronoiAreaSpec())); As you noticed, if you pass in a locally allocated object, it goes out of scope and you get a crash. Although I'm not sure how you're able to pass it in by value rather than by pointer! I would like, if possible, to avoid this pointer ownership stuff in the FastJets interface... I'm sure it's possible, just needs a bit of care and thought about backward compatibility. Pointers were used historically because we need the option of a null AreaDefinition, and there's no such thing as a null reference in C++. Hope that helps, Andy -- Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow
More information about the Rivet mailing list |