|
[Rivet] ChargedLeptons including neutrinos?Andy Buckley andy.buckley at cern.chTue Sep 20 14:19:57 BST 2016
That seems like a reasonable thing to also change to require charged leptons -- the name is clear that leptons are involved and there's no point in dressing neutrinos. Any objections? Thanks again Markus. Andy On 20/09/16 13:55, Markus Seidel wrote: > Addendum: The DressedLeptons projection currently prevents neutral > particles (like neutrinos) from being dressed with photons but still > returns the bare neutrals. > (Might be intended for flexibility?) > > Cheers, > Markus > > Am 20.09.2016 um 14:22 schrieb Markus Seidel: >> Hi Andy, >> >> thanks for fixing ChargedLeptons :) >> >> I think the problem with PromptFinalState was my mistake. I intended to >> select events with exactly one lepton (not from tau). By just using >> accepttaudecays=false I ended up with still having dilepton e/mu+tau >> events in the selection. >> So in the end I implemented a veto on W>tau+nu_tau as a workaround for >> the partonic decay selection. Afaik Holger is looking at >> CMS_2016_I1473674 and may come up with a better solution. >> >> Cheers, >> Markus >> >> Am 20.09.2016 um 12:01 schrieb Andy Buckley: >>> The ChargedLeptons fix is done -- thanks. >>> >>> I couldn't find a problem with the PromptFinalState prompt-tau option, >>> though. It just defers to the Particle::isPrompt(from_prompt_tau, ...) >>> method and the source of that looks ok to me. >>> >>> Maybe the problem was the documentation and arg names: that option does >>> not *insist* on prompt taus (which would be a job e.g. for TauFinder and >>> Particle::isPrompt()) but rather decides whether leptons from the decay >>> of prompt taus are themselves to be considered prompt. I've tried to >>> improve the docs a bit... but would that explain the behaviour you saw? >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> On 20/09/16 10:40, Andy Buckley wrote: >>>> Hi Markus -- argh! I'll fix that right away. I'll also take a look at >>>> PromptFinalState, since I think you reported that the from_prompt_tau >>>> bool option was not working. These should appear in a new release very >>>> soon: we're just putting the last touches on it. >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> >>>> On 20/09/16 10:22, Markus Seidel wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> it seems the ChargedLeptons projection asks for Rivet::PID::isLepton >>>>> but >>>>> does not check if the lepton is actually charged... >>>>> >>>>> Expected behaviour would be that one can feed in a generic FinalState >>>>> and gets out only charged leptons. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Markus >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Rivet mailing list >>>>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org >>>>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow
More information about the Rivet mailing list |