[Rivet] PartonicTops with em shower

[Andy Buckley]

Hi Markus,

Ha! Coming up with solid truth-level definitions is like creating taax 
law without loopholes, apparently.

I'll need to go back and remind myself of exactly what logic we have 
here, but we can get a fix in for the next Rivet release (which is way 
behind schedule due to a holiday and deadlines piling up... but it will 
happen soon!). Thanks for the detective work :-)

Andy


On 20/04/17 10:04, Markus Seidel wrote:
> Dear Rivet authors,
>
> as you know PartonicTops projection is important for many CMS top
> analyses at 8 TeV :s
> People stumbled upon the following problem: If there is a photon->l+l-
> within the shower, the top mother is flagged as leptonic.
>
> Maybe we can replace
>> const bool prompt_e/mu = any(...);
> by
>> const bool prompt_e/mu = (count(...) % 2);
> and
>> if (prompt_e/mu && (...)) return true;
> by
>> if (prompt_e/mu && !prompt_mu/e && (...)) return true;
>
> For the hadronic part there needs to be an `xor` between `prompt_e` and
> `prompt_mu` at least...
>
> If you prefer to not mess around with the logic, we may just require
> that the lepton does not have any photon mother...
>> ... && !p.hasAncestor(PID::PHOTON)
>
> It seems to be hopeless to account for all possibilities of a full weak
> shower but at least the case of em shower is very common (at least in
> Pythia 8?).
>
> Cheers,
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> Rivet mailing list
> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet


-- 
Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow
Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow