|
[Rivet] setSumOfWeightsSilvan Kuttimalai silvan at slac.stanford.eduThu Mar 15 18:49:07 GMT 2018
Hi Andy, thanks for the quick response! If I understand the issue correctly, then we might just as well re-set the total cross sections for our sub-contributions and leave the sum of weights untouched. To me this even seems like to conceptually better way of doing it. I just ran a test and it appears to work for us. Would you see any issues in this approach? Best regards, Silvan On 03/15/2018 03:55 AM, Andy Buckley wrote: > Hi Silvan, > > The issue is that more than the sum of weights alone is needed now. > Can you also supply the sum of squared weights? If so, I'll add an > extra argument and an implementation to version 2.6.1. > > Andy > > *Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow* > Particle Physics Experiment Group, University of Glasgow > > > > On Mar 14 2018, at 11:45 pm, Silvan Kuttimalai > <silvan at slac.stanford.edu> wrote: > > > Dear Rivet Authors, > > we noted that in Rivet version 2.6.0 the method > AnalysisHandler::setSumOfWeights is not present anymore. We used this > method in Sherpa in order to automatically split up our rivet analysis > output by contributions from H and S events in MC at NLO for example. To > get the normalization of these sub contributions right, we set the sum > of weights explicitly at the end of the run. Is there an > alternative for > this procedure in the new version? > > Many thanks, > Silvan > _______________________________________________ > Rivet mailing list > Rivet at projects.hepforge.org > https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet >
More information about the Rivet mailing list |