|
[PyFeyn] Object-orientationhippel at kph.uni-mainz.de hippel at kph.uni-mainz.deSat Jul 24 15:04:50 BST 2010
Hi, I can't remember is there was a particular reason to do things this way -- probably not. I'm at ICHEP at the moment, so I won't have time to work on this during the next few days, but I'll look into it. I think there was the idea of adding a "Page" class that could hold several Feynman diagrams. Best wishes, Georg Quoting Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at ed.ac.uk>: > On 22/07/10 23:47, Jesse Dunietz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm using PyFeyn for a project, and I'm immensely puzzled as to why > > there is canvas and current-diagram information kept at the class > > level for the FeynDiagram class. Why would you not give each diagram > > object its own canvas, perhaps with the option of specifying a canvas > > in the constructor? I'm having an impossible time trying to draw > > multiple diagrams from my code. > > That sounds very sensible! I've personally not had time to do any > development on PyFeyn for a *very* long time, but if you provide a patch > to implement the object-level current canvas storage then I'll happily > integrate it into the SVN version. Maybe Georg also has something to say... > > Andy > > -- > Dr Andy Buckley > SUPA Advanced Research Fellow > Particle Physics Experiment Group, University of Edinburgh > _______________________________________________ > PyFeyn mailing list > PyFeyn at projects.hepforge.org > http://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/pyfeyn > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
More information about the PyFeyn mailing list |