|
[Rivet] FastJets problemsJames Monk jmonk at hep.ucl.ac.ukMon Oct 19 20:57:38 BST 2009
Hi, On 19 Oct 2009, at 18:28, Hendrik Hoeth wrote: > Okay. In SISCONE we currently use 0.5 hard-coded. In CDFJETCLU and > CDFMIDPOINT we use 0.75, also hard-coded. Didn't some early CDF run II analyses also use split-merge of 0.5 in CDF Midpoint? Should it be hard-coded? cheers, James
More information about the Rivet mailing list |