[Rivet] FastJets problems

James Monk jmonk at hep.ucl.ac.uk
Mon Oct 19 20:57:38 BST 2009


Hi,

On 19 Oct 2009, at 18:28, Hendrik Hoeth wrote:

> Okay. In SISCONE we currently use 0.5 hard-coded. In CDFJETCLU and
> CDFMIDPOINT we use 0.75, also hard-coded.


Didn't some early CDF run II analyses also use split-merge of 0.5 in  
CDF Midpoint?  Should it be hard-coded?

cheers,

James


More information about the Rivet mailing list