[Rivet] FastJets problems

[Hendrik Hoeth]

Thus spake James Monk (jmonk at hep.ucl.ac.uk):

> On 19 Oct 2009, at 18:28, Hendrik Hoeth wrote:
> 
> > Okay. In SISCONE we currently use 0.5 hard-coded. In CDFJETCLU and
> > CDFMIDPOINT we use 0.75, also hard-coded.
> 
> Didn't some early CDF run II analyses also use split-merge of 0.5 in  
> CDF Midpoint?  Should it be hard-coded?

Maybe? Probably? In fact I wouldn't be surprised. But I don't know.

-- 
"You have to take the most direct road to go instead of your
 meeting, you have to, this one ended, leave at once the CERN
 domain."         (imprint on the CERN visitor ID cards)