[Rivet] Unvalidated analyses? (esp. CDF_1994 & HERA analyses)

Andy Buckley andy.buckley at ed.ac.uk
Sat Apr 3 21:09:57 BST 2010


On 29/03/10 14:44, Frank Siegert wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> Andy Buckley, Monday 29 March 2010:
>> I'm sure there are more analyses which can be brought into the main
>> libraries, with a bit of validation work: 
> 
> I absolutely agree.
> 
>> Frank:
>>     CDF_1996_S3108457.cc
>>     CDF_1996_S3349578.cc
>>     CDF_1997_S3541940.cc
> 
> I have run those and there are a few distributions which are still wrong. 
> The analyses are quite involved though with boosting etc., so I will need 
> a little time to validate/debug them.

No problem.

>>     D0_1996_S3214044.cc (with Lars -- needs jet alg)
>>     D0_1996_S3324664.cc (with Lars -- needs jet alg)
> 
> Waiting for Lars's feedback re the D0 Run1 cone.

Have you got a working system yet, Lars?

>> James:
>>     CDF_2007_S7057202.cc
> 
> I'm interested in that as well, and have actually opened a ticket about 
> its validation status a while ago. If James doesn't want to maintain it 
> anymore, I could take it over.

James, what do you think? Is this the one that you've committed with the
BinnedHistogram improvement, Frank?

Andy

-- 
Dr Andy Buckley
SUPA Advanced Research Fellow
Particle Physics Experiment Group, University of Edinburgh


More information about the Rivet mailing list