[Rivet] AGILe head install

Andy Buckley andy.buckley at ed.ac.uk
Mon Apr 26 19:17:02 BST 2010


On 26/04/10 18:00, Lars Sonnenschein wrote:
> Hello Andy
> the CDF 1994 analysis gives sensible "raw" plots.
> How should the full vs. fast sim corrections be applied?

By "fast sim", you mean just the truth-level MC, right?

> Is there a way to not only book the histograms, but also get their 
> contents with errors from the reference files?

This is something we want, but not currently available.

> Or should I add the correction factors as constants in a vector, one 
> element for a given bin? 

I think that's the best we can do for this analysis. Are the correction
factors given somewhere, or do you mean to get them by running e.g. a
certain PYTHIA tune and putting the data/PYTHIA ratios into a vector?

If the agreement is reasonably close, and there is no "official"
semi-MC-independent correction factor list, then I think it best to not
invent our own correction factors but rather to specify in the analysis
metadata that the data is uncorrected and hence should not be used in
tuning, but that it is good enough for qualitative validation comparisons.

Thanks for the effort :)

Andy

-- 
Dr Andy Buckley
SUPA Advanced Research Fellow
Particle Physics Experiment Group, University of Edinburgh


More information about the Rivet mailing list