|
[Rivet] AGILe head installAndy Buckley andy.buckley at ed.ac.ukMon Apr 26 19:17:02 BST 2010
On 26/04/10 18:00, Lars Sonnenschein wrote: > Hello Andy > the CDF 1994 analysis gives sensible "raw" plots. > How should the full vs. fast sim corrections be applied? By "fast sim", you mean just the truth-level MC, right? > Is there a way to not only book the histograms, but also get their > contents with errors from the reference files? This is something we want, but not currently available. > Or should I add the correction factors as constants in a vector, one > element for a given bin? I think that's the best we can do for this analysis. Are the correction factors given somewhere, or do you mean to get them by running e.g. a certain PYTHIA tune and putting the data/PYTHIA ratios into a vector? If the agreement is reasonably close, and there is no "official" semi-MC-independent correction factor list, then I think it best to not invent our own correction factors but rather to specify in the analysis metadata that the data is uncorrected and hence should not be used in tuning, but that it is good enough for qualitative validation comparisons. Thanks for the effort :) Andy -- Dr Andy Buckley SUPA Advanced Research Fellow Particle Physics Experiment Group, University of Edinburgh
More information about the Rivet mailing list |