[Rivet] correction on ATLAS_2011_I944826 routine

[Sercan Sen]

Hi Frank,

what about the "nstable" requirement... does that only look at
particles >100 MeV?

yes, this is what I understand from the paper -- and it's reasonable.

trigger cut is 2.09 < |\eta| < 3.84
analysis cuts: |\eta| < 2.5, 100*MeV, ....

I think the best way is to use another projection for the trigger requirement.

Cheers,
Sercan






On Oct 23, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Frank Siegert wrote:

Hi Sercan,

Right. "nstable" part should be in |\eta| < 2.5 . So, if we extend the
rapidity acceptance in the CFS projection, then we should apply a rapidity
cut in the "nstable" part..

Thanks for the clarification.

By the way, I don't know if we need 100*MeV for ATLAS MBTS requirement (this
is applied in the current code) ? Probably, we don't need it but this should
be checked by someone from ATLAS..

Then again the same follow-up question: If the 100 MeV is not
necessary for the MBTS trigger requirement (pending confirmation by
Emily), what about the "nstable" requirement... does that only look at
particles >100 MeV?

Cheers,
Frank

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.hepforge.org/lists-archive/rivet/attachments/20121024/4d066023/attachment.html>