|
[Rivet] Rivet 2.0.0b1 and YODA 1.0.0 (?) releases... any objections?Andy Buckley andy.buckley at ed.ac.ukFri Apr 12 15:51:11 BST 2013
No objection heard... proceeding with the release now! On 11/04/13 16:10, Andy Buckley wrote: > Hi all, > > I think we now have fairly stable and problem free (ha!) release > candidates for YODA and Rivet2. The last few commits fix the building on > lxplus again, and I think all is well. So are there any objections to > releasing these ~ today? > > I think we've established that this will be Rivet 2.0.0b1, since some > AIDA -> YODA conversion TODOs remain, and we want to do the full > regression accuracy check before making the proper 2.0.0 release (and > hence abandoning the 1.x series ~ completely). But we had decided > whether this should be a beta release or full release of YODA, and what > version number. > > I'm in favour of not agonising over this too much: several of us have > been using YODA in the current state for quite a while without problems, > hence I think it should just be a straight 1.0.0: the > 1 major version > and lack of "alpha/beta" status inspire a bit of confidence in its > readiness. The mechanisms for run merging, ROOT format conversion and so > on are all there, it's just a few user-convenience scripts that are > missing... and more fancy-but-not-crucial ideas can just wait for 1.1, > 1.2, etc. Like Rivet it may be version 2 before we finally manage to > implement our "vision" of all the stuff that YODA should be able to do :-) > > Again, any objection to this? > > If I hear no complaints, I'll tag these and send another announcement > out tonight. > > Andy > -- Dr Andy Buckley, Royal Society University Research Fellow Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Edinburgh The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
More information about the Rivet mailing list |