[Rivet] Several problem analyses

[Andy Buckley]

Hi David,

Can you/Peter put them in the Rivet Trac? I am trying to use that when
doing blocks of Rivet work toward releases. Which reminds me that I have
a bunch of issues noted down to fix for a 2.1.3 release asap.

We definitely need to get this bunch, or at least most of them, also
done for the next release... but I won't be able to do it alone. Who can
spare a bit of effort to fix an analysis or two?

After 2.1.3 we really need to make the push for jet/cut/tagging
improvements in release 2.2.0. We/I set the BOOST tutorial as our target
for releasing those features, and August is starting to look awfully
close...

Andy


On 04/07/14 12:25, David Grellscheid wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I propose to flag the following analyses as unvalidated for now, until
> someone has time to fix these issues Peter found:
> 
> ATLAS_2012_I1093734:
> Off-by-one binning problem (one of many attached as d01x01y01)
> 
> ATLAS_2012_I1091481 (already unvalidated):
> scaling is completely off (one attached as d01x01y03)
> 
> MC_WPOL:
> very bizarre axis choice in many plots (see e.g. attached A1_wplus)
> 
> D0_2008_S7719523:
> Ratio plots are completely messed up
> 
> And there is ATLAS_2012_I1094061 which is still missing from YODA
> completely.
> 
> What's the currently fashionable way to keep track of these issues? :-)
> 
> See you,
> 
>   David
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rivet mailing list
> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
> 


-- 
Dr Andy Buckley, Royal Society University Research Fellow
Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow / PH Dept, CERN