|
[Rivet] MissingMomentum and WFinder problem & plans for 2.4.0Chris Pollard cpollard at cern.chWed Sep 16 09:57:54 BST 2015
The validation is running now. Will let you know the outcome when it finishes (~hours). Chris On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch> wrote: > Done, and pushed. I added an optional "mass" arg to the > MissingMomentum::visibleMom and ::missingMom methods, and fixed up WFinder > to use the zero-mass target rather than subtracting the visible momentum > from (sqrtS,0,0,0) -- cunning, but I think it meant that the vector still > had the mass of what went down the beampipe, i.e. high! > > This definitely needs a validation run. Maybe we could even try running a > few WFinder analyses in the system ~now, Chris, to make sure I didn't > completely balls it up? > > Andy > > > > On 15/09/15 15:17, David Grellscheid wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I agree with zero mass as the default. Maybe we can introduce a target >> mass in the MissingMomentum projection, to give theory input in the >> analyses that may need it. But in the absence of any other information >> the m=0 assumption is certainly a good one. >> >> David >> >> On 15/09/2015 10:09, Chris Pollard wrote: >> >>> I'm in favor of only exposing the MissingMomentum 3-momentum. >>> >>> I also agree that setting the neutrino mass to zero when solving for >>> the W >>> mass is the right way to go, although David G should comment on whether >>> this would break BSM reinterpretations. >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> A summer student working with Chris and I spotted last week that the W >>>> returned from WFinder is still nonsensical. >>>> >>>> The cuts are ok, and the lepton is also fine, but the use of the full 4D >>>> missing ET vector to make the "pseudo-neutrino" messes up because that >>>> vector has an energy component equal to the energy sum of all the >>>> in-acceptance particles used to calculated the *visible* momentum >>>> against >>>> which the missing one is balanced. >>>> >>>> One option would be to reduce the MissingMomentum to the transverse >>>> vector >>>> only, but that seems too far because it should also be usable in e+e- >>>> colliders. It also seems wrong to give the missing momentum vector a >>>> null >>>> mass, because while that's fine for neutrinos it's wrong for BSM >>>> invisibles. >>>> >>>> I suggest that we change the MissingMomentum interface (again... I >>>> already >>>> made some enhancements for 2.4.0) to only expose a 3-momentum. The E >>>> component is really a misleading accident. What do you think? Any >>>> objections or alternative suggestions? (A user-specified missing >>>> momentum >>>> mass target, maybe?) >>>> >>>> Similarly, we can't just restrict the WFinder to use transverse mass due >>>> to e+e- compatibility. But there we do have a definite hypothesis >>>> that the >>>> missing momentum vector should be a neutrino, so we could set the >>>> pseudo-nu >>>> mass to zero, and feed that into the pseudo-W mass in the case that full >>>> rather than transverse mass is used. Again, thoughts? >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> PS. Still waiting for analysis integration volunteers. I'll start >>>> forcibly >>>> assigning them if I don't hear soon (this is the procedure we agreed >>>> on!), >>>> so this is your chance to take a quick look at the tarballs and pick a >>>> couple of easy ones ;-) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow >>>> Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Rivet mailing list >>>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org >>>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rivet mailing list >>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org >>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> Rivet mailing list >> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org >> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet >> > > > -- > Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow > Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow > _______________________________________________ > Rivet mailing list > Rivet at projects.hepforge.org > https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.hepforge.org/lists-archive/rivet/attachments/20150916/176b7c43/attachment.html>
More information about the Rivet mailing list |