[Rivet] DELPHI_2003_WUD_03_11 removed?

[Andy Buckley]

"Not too sure" meant "Couldn't reproduce", from what I remember. If it 
had ever looked robust I think it wouldn't have been unvalidated. Not 
one to rely on in tuning or validation...

Andy


On 22/09/15 15:56, David Grellscheid wrote:
> Is that a reason to remove it rather than mark it unvalidated?
>
>    David
>
> On 22/09/2015 16:50, Holger Schulz wrote:
>> On 22/09/15 15:46, David Grellscheid wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> has anyone got an idea why DELPHI_2003_WUD_03_11 was removed as
>>> obsolete (1st July, by Holger)? I can't find an obvious replacement.
>>
>> Yes, it's Hendrik Hoeth's Diploma thesis which he was never too
>> confident about.
>>
>> Holger
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>   David
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rivet mailing list
>>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
>>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Rivet mailing list
> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet


-- 
Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow
Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow