[Rivet] DELPHI_2003_WUD_03_11 removed?

[David Grellscheid]

Makes sense, thanks!

  David


On 22/09/2015 16:59, Andy Buckley wrote:
> "Not too sure" meant "Couldn't reproduce", from what I remember. If it
> had ever looked robust I think it wouldn't have been unvalidated. Not
> one to rely on in tuning or validation...
>
> Andy
>
>
> On 22/09/15 15:56, David Grellscheid wrote:
>> Is that a reason to remove it rather than mark it unvalidated?
>>
>>    David
>>
>> On 22/09/2015 16:50, Holger Schulz wrote:
>>> On 22/09/15 15:46, David Grellscheid wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> has anyone got an idea why DELPHI_2003_WUD_03_11 was removed as
>>>> obsolete (1st July, by Holger)? I can't find an obvious replacement.
>>>
>>> Yes, it's Hendrik Hoeth's Diploma thesis which he was never too
>>> confident about.
>>>
>>> Holger
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>   David
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Rivet mailing list
>>>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
>>>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rivet mailing list
>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>
>